King Charles Delivers Highly-Politicised Speech to Support Collectivist Net Zero Project

From The Daily Sceptic

BY CHRIS MORRISON

It could have been worse. King Charles could have ascended to his desert dais and pronounced that we had just 96 months to avert “irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse”. But that was the Right Charlie back in 2009, giving us the benefit of his sandwich-board scientific wisdom. These days it is all fashionable bad weather and undefined “tipping points”. The man is now King, and at COP28 he threw away his irksome politically-neutral constitutional role, wrapped himself in Guardianista pseudoscience, and punched down hard on the poor who will be forced to pay for the collectivist madness that is the Net Zero project.

King Charles is no friend of general humanity. Speaking at COP28, he said: “The Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the Earth.” As with many know-your-place elitists, he appears to abhor the impacts that humans have on the planet. He exhibits, sadly on a world stage, a snobbish distain for capitalism – what used to be dismissed in British aristocratic circles as ‘trade’. This capitalist trend over the last 200 years has harnessed the power of natural hydrocarbons to raise billions to a standard of living and health unimaginable to previous generations. In 2009, Charles said we can no longer afford consumerism and the “age of convenience” was over.

Not for the new British King, it need hardly be observed. He lives a life of pampered indulgence where no expense is spared to ensure his every comfort. On his accession to the throne, he added considerably to his Palace Portfolio. To spread his malevolent Net Zero fantasies, he has a fleet of cars, private planes and even a personal train at his command. He uses these to call for “transformational action” to be taken to save the planet. In his COP28 speech, he called for the restoration of nature, the need for sustainable agriculture, and co-operation between the public and private sectors.

Few calls could be more political in tone. The restoration of nature and sustainable agriculture is shorthand for largely meat-free diets and massive reductions in nitrogen fertiliser. The latter, in particular, will lead to worldwide famine. COP28 seems set to announce new food and agriculture restrictions using the tactic of demonising methane, a gas emitted by animals and humans that is barely measurable in the atmosphere due to a very short lifecycle. Whenever the subject of ‘co-operation’ between public and private sectors is raised, there is an immediate dash to count the spoons, since it can only signal a large transfer of cash from productive industries to unproductive and inferior green operations.

At one point in his COP speech, King Charles veered into sandwich-board territory claiming that “we are seeing alarming tipping points being reached”. There was no evidence presented to justify this claim, often made by climate extremists using modelled data. In fact, he didn’t even refer to any actual ‘tipping’ event that has been reached. Many scientists have concluded that bad, or extreme, weather events are no worse than in the immediate past. Many categories of natural disasters such as floods, droughts and ecosystem productivity “show no clear positive trend of extreme events”, note a group of four Italian scientists. They argue that the data shows there is no “climate emergency”.

None of these facts seem to matter to a political King, who, like a stuck Guardian record, keeps on pressing on with made-up emotional stories of impending climate Armageddon. At one point he referred to repeated cyclones battering vulnerable islands, something that cyclones have always done.

The King can always cherry-pick individual storms but there is plenty of evidence to show that hurricane and cyclone frequency, along with intensity, has changed little over the recent historical record, as the above graph shows.

Wildfires are a bit of a dud when it comes to whipping up climate hysteria, not least because the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change notes that most conflagrations are started by humans. “Human activities have become the dominant driver,” it observes. But when there is political Net Zero work to be done, the King is only too happy to overlook the evidence. In common with many other countries this year, Canada experienced its worst wildfires for a century, he said.

Despite all the human involvement, the above graph shows the gradual decline of global emissions from wildfires over recent decades. In fact, wildfires are almost impossible to pin on any changes on climate since so many other factors, such as arson and land management, are in play.

Net Zero is rapidly becoming the dominant political issue of the age. Its obvious collectivist nature gathers support from mostly sectional interests in society. It has no significant grassroots support, since it aims to restrict human lifestyles and wealth on a scale never attempted before in history. It is awash with junk science, fake statistics and computer models.

The late Queen, in her infinite wisdom, never went anywhere near it.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Stop Press: David Cameron at COP28 has said the U.K. will pay £60 million in climate reparations to developing countries. The Epoch Times has more.

5 20 votes
Article Rating
117 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
schmoozer
December 2, 2023 10:16 pm

Pure BS. As king, he is supposed to stay out of politics.

Streetcred
Reply to  schmoozer
December 3, 2023 12:08 am

Same bloke that wants to be reincarnated as a tampon.

bnice2000
Reply to  Streetcred
December 3, 2023 12:26 am

He’s already pretty close to being one !

More a “sanitary napkin” though.

Mr.
Reply to  bnice2000
December 3, 2023 1:02 pm

Every asshole should have some form of covering I reckon.
But some much more than others.
Do they make King-size diapers?

Rich Davis
Reply to  schmoozer
December 3, 2023 5:13 am

Defender of the Faith repudiates Genesis 1:28

QuestingVole
Reply to  Rich Davis
December 3, 2023 8:19 am

Not to mention Genesis 1:31 – And God saw everything that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
(Except CO2, of course, and fossil fuels.)
The old man in the Vatican clearly has no faith in the ‘Giver of all good gifts’ either. ‘Is the Pope a Catholic?’ Not on recent evidence.

Scissor
Reply to  schmoozer
December 3, 2023 8:06 am

As a clown, he’s doing a great job.

wilpost
Reply to  schmoozer
December 3, 2023 1:20 pm

You mean climate religion?

ATheoK
Reply to  schmoozer
December 3, 2023 10:34 pm

Pure BS. As king, he is supposed to stay out of politics.”

Import more squirrels for outside KC’s windows. Make sure the population of squirrels stays high. That should keep the king busy day to day.
Some large fox squirrels would be nice.

Peter Meadows
December 2, 2023 10:20 pm

The Queen will be turning in her grave. Charlie boy has broken the first rule of modern British Monarchy – do not be political. The fact that he obviously believes that this is “science” not “politics” just shows what an absolute fool this man is. No wonder his idiot son in the US is such a dickhead, it is clearly inherited. I suppose inbreeding has to show up sooner or later.

And in case anyone is wondering p, I am a Scottish born Australian, bought up to respect our Monarchy, but this is an idiot that deserves no respect.

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Peter Meadows
December 3, 2023 12:23 am

Our King Biden isn’t very smart either. And he should’ve stayed out of politics too.

bnice2000
Reply to  Jim Masterson
December 3, 2023 12:52 pm

Better to the thought of as a fool..

… than to open your mouth and prove it !

ie, ST*U, you idiotic clown king !

HotScot
Reply to  Peter Meadows
December 3, 2023 1:48 am

The ginger dickhead in America sure ain’t Charlie’s son.

Although he is a Charlie.

Ron Long
Reply to  Peter Meadows
December 3, 2023 2:22 am

Prince Charles was denied entry into the Wharton Business School MBA program due to being judged as “unable to complete the curriculum”. Sort of code for not too smart. To top it off he did not learn good manners from his mother, Queen Elizabeth. Prince Charles fell off his polo horse many times and then was kicked in the arm which broke it. Then he traded Diana for Camila. Now he is the King. Of course he says stupid things.

bnice2000
Reply to  Peter Meadows
December 3, 2023 12:50 pm

I am a Scottish born Australian,”

Me too ! 🙂

Mr.
Reply to  Peter Meadows
December 3, 2023 1:09 pm

I’m told by Canadian contacts that there has been a drop-off in interest by recent immigrants there to become Canadian citizens, not least due to the requirement to now swear allegiance to King Charles, instead of Queen Elizabeth.

Obviously Canada is importing a more clued-up type of immigrant than resides in the UK.

Richard Page
Reply to  Mr.
December 4, 2023 2:34 am

I doubt it – thanks to the open borders policy we (don’t) have there is no requirement for these military-age muslims from extremist states to swear allegiance to anyone, least of all Chucklehead Charlie.

Phillip Bratby
December 2, 2023 10:48 pm

This is why we hoped that Queen Elizabeth would outlive Charles. The queen was sensible and knew her role. Apart from Princess Anne, the rest of the Royal Family are as stupid as Charles.

Ian_e
Reply to  Phillip Bratby
December 3, 2023 1:35 am

Mind you, she went woke over covid. But no, not nearly as much of a disaster as Charlie boy.

cgh
Reply to  Phillip Bratby
December 3, 2023 11:20 am

And some are downright vile. Prince Andrew is the vile one. Princess Anne filled in as Princess Royal for Queen Elizabeth admirably for several years. She would have been a vast improvement over Charles who is perhaps as silly as his ancestor Charles !.

And it should be noted that the youngest son Edward Duke of Edinburgh is just fine,very sensible, and actually went out and got a career and job rather than just live off his income granted by Parliament.

Tombstone Gabby
Reply to  cgh
December 3, 2023 4:09 pm

G’Day cgh,

“…as silly as his ancestor Charles!”

Charles I, was beheaded.

Charles II, titular head of the Church of England, on his death bed called for a Catholic priest.

Charles III, I really think the name is jinxed…..

Milo
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
December 4, 2023 1:22 pm

Charles I and II were both traitors. The First got what he deserved.

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
December 4, 2023 11:57 pm

I used to know all the British kings and queens from William the Conqueror to Elizabeth II, but those brain cells are mostly dead. I also knew all of my U.S. Presidents, but those brain cells are mostly dead too. And I once knew all the states and their capitols, but, alas, those brain cells are again mostly dead. I do remember a mnemonic given to me by a fellow student about the Magna Carta: they signed the document and then sat down to lunch fifteen minutes later–1215. Of course, I don’t think King John was in a “lunchy” mood.

Tombstone Gabby
Reply to  Jim Masterson
December 5, 2023 7:17 am

G’Day Jim.

“…from William the Conqueror to Elizabeth II.”

History is fun. Something I tripped over a couple of years ago. Francis Drake was the first English sea captain to circumnavigate the world. He was knighted by Elizabeth I. Francis Chichester was the first Englishman to circumnavigate single-handed. He was knighted by Elizabeth II. The same sword was used in both ceremonies.

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
December 5, 2023 9:19 am

Interesting!

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
December 5, 2023 10:00 pm

I was watching a series on Queen Victoria a while back. There was an insurrection that demanded the usual English punishment for treason: hanging, drawing, and quartering. She intervene and didn’t allow the horrible punishment. The US Constitution doesn’t allow such punishments for treason or any crime. It seems that treason is okay in the US.

Tombstone Gabby
Reply to  Jim Masterson
December 5, 2023 10:32 pm

G’Day Jim,

The US Constitution doesn’t allow…”

Nor did the English “Bill of Rights” from 1689.

[10] That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted; 

The English and US versions of a “Bill of Rights” are very similar. The Founding fathers did change a few things. In the English version:

[7] That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;

In the US version the final four words for that Right are “…shall not be infringed.”

Local: 2335 hrs. Back tomorrow…..

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
December 5, 2023 10:58 pm

“Nor did the English “Bill of Rights” from 1689.”

So the show was wrong, as Queen Victoria lived after the 1600s.

Tombstone Gabby
Reply to  Jim Masterson
December 6, 2023 7:00 am

G’Day Jim

So the show was wrong…”

It may well have happened, or was just something a script writer thought would be dramatic. Hard to say.

A large part of English Common Law carried over into the United States. My main interests have been birthright citizenship, abortion, bearing arms, and jury nullification.

universalaccessnz
December 2, 2023 11:24 pm

Charlie Boy is a ‘do as I say, not as I do’ person. If he is correct, he won’t be able to talk to his plants. They will all be dying from CO2 starvation. Does anyone know how he heats his many homes? I suspect he will get a few surprises this winter as energy-driven appliances demand exceeds supply.

decnine
Reply to  universalaccessnz
December 3, 2023 5:01 am

Quite a bit more of the world doesn’t belong to Charles than the bit that doesn’t belong to me.

UK-Weather Lass
December 2, 2023 11:44 pm

And so who told this pathetic excuse for a human being that he has the right to speak for anyone other than himself? His Mother was a very decent and dedicated human being who earned the respect of Her subjects but Charles is not even close to being respected and knows nothing about climate science which is, of course, why he is at COP28.

Streetcred
Reply to  UK-Weather Lass
December 3, 2023 12:10 am

Pity that the French Reovultion was not more widespread.

Ben Vorlich
Reply to  Streetcred
December 3, 2023 12:45 am

Having lived in rural France for nearly ten years I can tell you that those living in the country are fascinated by the British Royal Family. When asked why they can’t explain it.

nurtureyourchild
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
December 3, 2023 12:59 am

Lol

Petermiller
December 3, 2023 12:17 am

Few would dare call Charlie Boy a mental heavyweight, more a mediocre mind obsessed with the idea of “saving the planet” and being recognised as the one responsible for it.

Queen Elizabeth, the UK’s previous monarch, was loved and respected, while her son Charlie Boy is the opposite and widely mocked for his failure to understand the most important lesson of being a successful modern day monarch: You are there to be seen, not heard – no one cares about your opinions.

Ben Vorlich
Reply to  Petermiller
December 3, 2023 12:48 am

Unfortunately the heir is just as green as his father. Flying around the world presenting Green Shot prizes.

QuestingVole
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
December 3, 2023 8:25 am

Unfair to Prince Philip. He was an early supporter of practical steps to protect endangered species and threatened habitats around the world. That did not include endorsing the ‘adopt a tiger and get a cuddly toy’ brigade, nor the oil-clad JSO terrorists.

cgh
Reply to  QuestingVole
December 3, 2023 11:23 am

Agreed entirely, QV. Prince Phillip was a war veteran, the real kind who was actually in a pitched battle and being shot at (Battle of Matapan, signal and lighting commander HMS Valiant.)

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
December 3, 2023 8:01 pm

Did you misspell Green Snot prizes?

Ian_e
Reply to  Petermiller
December 3, 2023 1:36 am

‘Mediocre mind’? Oh you are so kind.

HotScot
Reply to  Petermiller
December 3, 2023 1:55 am

He was a dunce at school. Had to have dedicated extra tuition to make it through.

Redge
December 3, 2023 12:44 am

Queen Elizabeth II was my Monarch.

Charlie is not my king.

Time for a British Revolution.
Qu’il mangent de la brioche !

strativarius
December 3, 2023 12:59 am

Off with his head.

Leo Smith
December 3, 2023 1:01 am

Charlie boy said what he was told to say.
He is a bear of very little brain, and he doesn’t understand Big Numbers.
As for a life of pampered luxury – no, that would be Meghan Markle.
Charles lives quite an austere life.

Ian_e
Reply to  Leo Smith
December 3, 2023 1:38 am

Your definition of austere rather clashes with mine.

HotScot
Reply to  Leo Smith
December 3, 2023 1:57 am

He has his personal staff iron his shoelaces FFS!

strativarius
Reply to  HotScot
December 3, 2023 2:06 am

And to put the toothpaste on the brush…

Tom Abbott
Reply to  strativarius
December 3, 2023 6:44 am

Is this true?

Scissor
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 3, 2023 8:12 am

It’s the same person that turns on the faucet.

bobpjones
Reply to  HotScot
December 3, 2023 4:04 am

And don’t forget his cherished toilet seat!

sturmudgeon
Reply to  bobpjones
December 3, 2023 8:04 pm

He should have stayed on it, instead of taking his s**t to COP28

Ian_e
December 3, 2023 1:30 am

As a citizen of the UK, may I say, oh dear, someone else attacking our monarchy.

p.s. Keep up the good work!

Rich Davis
Reply to  Ian_e
December 3, 2023 5:52 am

I can relate, but on the other hand, Ian, please do feel free to have at our Dementia Joe!

davylars
December 3, 2023 1:54 am

Now known as King Charles the Stupid…

Editor
Reply to  davylars
December 3, 2023 2:07 am

…and Charles the Turd.

Regards,
Bob

Rich Davis
Reply to  Bob Tisdale
December 3, 2023 5:54 am

Oh thaht was just me Irish brogue! I said T H I R D – turd.

strativarius
Reply to  davylars
December 3, 2023 2:07 am

Charles the Halfwit

Gregory Woods
Reply to  strativarius
December 3, 2023 3:14 am

Which half would that be?

bobpjones
Reply to  Gregory Woods
December 3, 2023 4:06 am

Well, his brain is in two halves.

In the left half, nothing is right
And in the right half, there’s nothing left.

Richard Page
Reply to  Gregory Woods
December 3, 2023 8:26 am

The half just below his belt buckle.

Gregory Woods
Reply to  davylars
December 3, 2023 3:12 am

Chuckie The K

Tom Halla
Reply to  davylars
December 3, 2023 5:42 am

Right up there with Ethelred the Unready

Richard Page
Reply to  Tom Halla
December 3, 2023 8:31 am

Sorry, it’s Ethelred the ‘unraed’ or ill-advised. A good fit for Chucklehead Charlie but not good for the rest of us here in the UK. What’s he going to do next, start refusing to sign laws that don’t agree with his woke principles?

DonM
Reply to  Tom Halla
December 4, 2023 12:29 pm

28th gg father.

He was ready enuf to do what was important to me.

Pat Frank
Reply to  davylars
December 3, 2023 10:53 am

Idiocracy on both sides of the pond.

Northern Bear
Reply to  davylars
December 3, 2023 1:54 pm

A King Charles Spaniel is brighter than Charlie Boy who is a total hypocrite

Ed Zuiderwijk
December 3, 2023 3:07 am

King ‘Charles the Vegan’? I doubt it.

kommando828
December 3, 2023 3:45 am

When he was Price Chuckles he decided to tour the UK to promote the Climate Change scare. So to look more Green he decided instead of using either his gas guzzling Aston Martin’s or the Royal Jet Aircraft he would instead take the Train. Only problem the Train was his own, 5 carriages solely for himself and his servants with a diesel loco on the front even when running on electrified lines.

1saveenergy
Reply to  kommando828
December 3, 2023 4:42 am

But, but, … it is a very nice colour !! a burgundy known as Royal Claret.

The train journeys made by the Royal Family during the year of the Golden Jubilee in 2002 cost £872,000 of taxpayer money.
In June 2022, royal accounts revealed that the late Queen had spent £100,000 of taxpayer money on the train despite using it only three times.

comment image&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=b036e89ab8c28c0388206e8ca97880be2ef4c81281df49e6cb396ffc8c69cdf9&ipo=images
6 carriages + 2 locos

Frank from NoVA
Reply to  1saveenergy
December 3, 2023 8:13 am

Nice photo! For the hobbyists among us, is the train available in HO guage?

atticman
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
December 3, 2023 9:47 am
atticman
Reply to  1saveenergy
December 3, 2023 9:48 am

Looks like 7 + 2 to me…

1saveenergy
Reply to  atticman
December 3, 2023 10:14 am

Yes you are correct …
One for each day of the week ???

bobpjones
December 3, 2023 4:00 am

KCIII, a right royal fart! So the CO2 mantra, is losing its influence, so let’s switch to methane.

wilpost
Reply to  bobpjones
December 3, 2023 1:26 pm

Kerry, another charlatan, wants to triple nuclear
He has no idea what that implies

Excerpt from

BATTERIES IN NEW ENGLAND?
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/batteries-in-new-england

Tripling Nuclear? During COP28 in opulent Dubai, Kerry called for the world to triple CO2-free nuclear, from 370,200 MW to about 1,200,000 MW, by 2050.
https://phys.org/news/2023-12-triple-nuclear-power-cop28.html

Based on past experience in the US and EU, it takes at least 10 years to commission nuclear plants

That means, plants with about 39 reactors must be started each year, for 16 years (2024 to 2040), to fill the pipeline, to commission the final ones by 2050, in addition to those already in the pipeline.

Nuclear would be 11% of total generation in 2050, certainly far from a big deal

That would require a major increase in infrastructures and educating and training of personnel.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/electricity-sources-by-fuel-in-2022/#:~:text=In%202022%2C%2029%2C165.2%20terawatt%20hours,2.3%25%20from%20the%20previous%20year.

Existing Nuclear, MW, 2022

370200

Proposed tripling

3

Tripled Nuxlear, MW, 2050

1110600

New Nuclear, MW

740400

MW/reactor

1200

Reactors

617

New Reactors, rounded

620

Reactors/sire

2

Sites

310

New nuclear production, MWh, 2050

5841311760

Conversion factor

1000000

%
New nuclear production, TWh, 2050

5841

11
World total production, TWh, 2050

53000

rah
December 3, 2023 4:13 am

Meanwhile, while Royalty and the Pope ramble on about how we’re all going to burn up from climate change. Bavaria gets slammed with the 10 year snow storm.

Right-Handed Shark
December 3, 2023 4:22 am

Unfortunately, too many people see high office as evidence that the incumbent is the smartest person in the room. We see this applied to politicians too. The fawning in the UK media yesterday was nauseating, all were praising Chuck’s “insight” and “wisdom”. Call me a cynic, but I couldn’t see past the result of centuries of inbreeding and the resultant destruction of intellect.

bnice2000
Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
December 3, 2023 12:58 pm

 is the smartest person in the room. “

In a room full of “climate scientists“..

.. he may well be. ! 🙂

Rod Evans
December 3, 2023 5:34 am

The Italian regnal name for our Charlie, seems very appropriate. Il Tamponi. Not sure if that should be defined as ‘the first’ but hey lets not get too fixated on such details.
His desire to occupy dark spaces before being dumped in the trash sort of sums up his standing in real society.
We should also remember he likes talking to trees? We are not told which tree is his favourite? My bet is it is the Ash. The final ceremonial sentence of existence uttered, dust to dust, ashes to ashes, probably inspired him to think those Ashes talk to each other so why not….
He is just not very bright.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Rod Evans
December 3, 2023 8:17 pm

His desire to occupy dark spaces before being dumped in the trash sort of sums up his standing in real society.”
We’re getting a lot of mileage out of those ‘beaver’ articles by Kip.

Tom Halla
December 3, 2023 5:39 am

The Windsors are not an advertisement for inbreeding.

scadsobees
December 3, 2023 5:45 am

Ha ha, they’re committing 60 million quid? That’s enough, in 2023 dollars, to help about 60 people!

Tom Abbott
Reply to  scadsobees
December 3, 2023 6:50 am

Kamala Harris said yesterday the U.S. was contributing three billion dollars to the climate reparations fund.

I doubt that is going to be enough to satisfy the activists.

ToldYouSo
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 3, 2023 7:35 am

. . . which just goes to show how much elevated King Charles’ IQ is above that of US VP Harris.

Some may have thought the race would be touch-‘n-go, but Kamala touched bottom first.

1saveenergy
Reply to  ToldYouSo
December 3, 2023 10:17 am

Who’s bottom did she touch ??

Richard Page
Reply to  1saveenergy
December 4, 2023 2:40 am

“Show me on the doll where the bad lady touched you.”

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 3, 2023 8:18 pm

She couldn’t even tell you how many zeroes are in 3 billion.

DonM
Reply to  sturmudgeon
December 4, 2023 12:34 pm

one?

DonM
Reply to  DonM
December 4, 2023 12:35 pm

nope … thats a letter not a zero.

bonbon
December 3, 2023 5:54 am

King Charles III is attempting a revival of King Edward VII’s Entente Cordiale, speaking perfect French at the Paris Senate.

Looks like Charles is running foreign policy, as did Edward.

And by 1914 the result was for all to see.
Have Macron and Sunak any idea of what is going on?
Le rage d’espérer franco-britannique ? Mais non, c’est une Entente Cordialle!
Looks like Berlin voters were simply not interested in Royalty, this time around,
Last time Kanzler Wilhelm was King Edward VII’s cousin as was Russia’s Czar Nicolas.- result WWI.

Tom Abbott
Reply to  bonbon
December 3, 2023 6:52 am

So you think Charles is smart enough to direct a conspiracy?

Richard Page
Reply to  Tom Abbott
December 4, 2023 2:42 am

Charles isn’t smart enough to direct a train and there are only 2 directions.

Scarecrow Repair
December 3, 2023 6:11 am

It is beyond my comprehension why anyone listens to anything a constitutional monarch says. The Saudi king, sure, he has power. But Charley III? Why pay attention to anything he says? Architecture, politics, science? No.

ToldYouSo
December 3, 2023 6:46 am

“I am firmly of the view that the next 18 months will decide our ability to keep climate change to survivable levels and to restore nature to the equilibrium we need for our survival”, Prince (now King) Charles speech at a Reception for Commonwealth Foreign Ministers, July 11, 2019
[note: July 11, 2019 + 18 months = mid-January 2021, so we passed that point-of-no-return nearly 3 years ago].

Substitute “infirmly” for the third word in the above quote and it truthfully becomes something Charles could have stated in his COP 28 speech.

antigtiff
December 3, 2023 6:51 am

Why doesn’t the “Press” press him on what he is personally doing to avoid the tipping points? Obviously he is doing little or nothing…his speech could have been a video and saved tonnes of CO2….he could live in a nice apartment and shut down the mansions….do it or shut up!

BobM
Reply to  antigtiff
December 3, 2023 7:12 am

Not just shut down the mansions… I’d much prefer watching a mansion or two be blown up than the destruction of perfectly good coal or nuclear plants.

Coach Springer
December 3, 2023 6:57 am

In other news, collectivist Pol Pot killed millions – of his own people. And they loved him for it. At least for a while. For some would-be leaders, total control is appealing. Period.

Frank from NoVA
Reply to  Coach Springer
December 3, 2023 8:06 am

Pol Pot was a huge fan of Rousseau, who, whether they realize it or not, is the patron saint of all radical environmentalists.

Richard Page
Reply to  Frank from NoVA
December 3, 2023 8:37 am

There you go, Rousseau again! Still it probably needs saying – there is a legacy of bad thinking which still needs to be overcome – Rousseau and Malthus among them.

cgh
Reply to  Richard Page
December 3, 2023 11:28 am

That bad thinking started with Plato. It has a long and dismal history of justifying authoritarians.

Richard Page
Reply to  cgh
December 4, 2023 2:49 am

Greece was the biggest slave owning society in the world – all city states had great numbers of slaves but in Athens there were more slaves than free men. No wonder there was an increase in art, philosophy and so on, they had slaves to do all of the heavy lifting. And people call it the birthplace of Western Civilisation – which is probably why we’re in this mess today!

Frank from NoVA
Reply to  Richard Page
December 4, 2023 8:00 am

The abomination that is slavery was common throughout the world before the 20th century. One could justifiably say that the Greeks at least started the ball rolling toward the Enlightenment, and eventually to the economic liberalization that lead to the Industrial Revolution. The former, of course, damned slavery; the latter, in reality, doomed it.

Frank from NoVA
Reply to  cgh
December 4, 2023 7:47 am

Thank you! I think the pairing of Plato and Aristotle in primary / secondary education is analogous to that of Locke and Rousseau – a way to get the nose of the collectivist / statist camel under the tent at an early age.

Frank from NoVA
Reply to  Richard Page
December 4, 2023 7:36 am

‘There you go, Rousseau again!’

Yep. Full disclosure, I’ve never taken a course in Philosophy, but I do recall from elementary school onward that whenever the subject of the Enlightenment comes up the mantra is always Locke AND Rousseau, as if their ideas are interchangeable parts on an assembly line.

They’re not, and my specific issue with Rousseau, besides all the Noble Savage nonsense, is his collectivist ideal that ‘the general will’ overrides individual rights. While I’m aware that his proponents believe that he was innocuously referring only to the ‘rule of law’ here, there’s been enough ‘bad thinking’ on this, as you say, to conclude that he really did favor an early form of what Marx eventually defined as the dictatorship of the proletariat. It’s no coincidence, then, that political movements based on Rousseau’s ideas turn into bloodbaths.

Not to mention that the creep forced his common law wife to turn his five children over to orphanages…

insufficientlysensitive
December 3, 2023 7:16 am

Net Zero is rapidly becoming the dominant political issue of the age. Its obvious collectivist nature gathers support from mostly sectional interests in society. 

That’s what they said about ‘socialism’ when Mr. Lenin and Mr. Trotsky were organizing their murderous mobs to promote a dreamy collectivist heaven. His Majesty is not the organizing equal of Lenin, but we who dumped his predecessors in 1776 might well revive some revolutionary moves to upset the knavish tricks the Netzeristas propose to use, in headg off our use of liberty for self-betterment. Down with His Nibs, and the new Politburo who twitch and twiddle his puppet-strings.

Coeur de Lion
December 3, 2023 9:30 am

The IPCC can’t find significant change in extreme weather events either. See Willis on his IPCC analysis this site
.

Joe Gordon
December 3, 2023 12:09 pm

Inbreeding. You can see why he was so concerned about the skin color of his grandchild.

It’s unfortunate that generations upon generations of this royal concept have produced someone so infantile intellectually that he sees nothing wrong with perpetuating religious nonsense at the cost of energy security for the masses he claims to represent.

It is long since time to get rid of the royals. And the popes, for that matter. They’re better suited for the presidency of a formerly elite university than any position with real responsibility.

sturmudgeon
Reply to  Joe Gordon
December 3, 2023 8:23 pm

You know of an ‘elite university’?

Larry Hamlin
December 3, 2023 4:31 pm

A truly pompous & clueless idiot. Must be inbreeding.

Edward Katz
December 3, 2023 5:47 pm

Like many or most of the bigwigs who fashion themselves as enviro-experts, Charles III’s proclamations are greeted with derision, and as long as people like him are given excessive media coverage, the less credibility the climate change movement will have.

CampsieFellow
December 4, 2023 3:21 am

Charles should have stayed in his dustbin instead of distributing rubbish all over the world.
https://www.gettyimages.no/detail/news-photo/prince-charles-as-student-at-cambridge-university-in-a-news-photo/80752057
Has any other country sent its head of government and head of state to Dubai?
Will King Charles in a fit of repentance for his carbon emissions getting to Dubai, pledge not to return to the UK?

ResourceGuy
December 4, 2023 6:15 am
Andy Pattullo
December 4, 2023 8:06 am

He is an hereditary monarch, not a scientist, not a maths wiz, not a policy leader, and not even someone who was ever gainfully employed. So why are his words worth broadcasting to the world as if they meant anything more than his idle musings on something he knows nothing about?

kwinterkorn
December 4, 2023 1:36 pm

King Charles is a rather strong argument against monarchy as a form of government.

Steve Wood
December 5, 2023 11:55 am

It’s very clear why Queen Elizabeth II never wanted to abdicate with her woke son waiting in the wings! Unfortunately William doesn’t look much better. I despair….

%d
Verified by MonsterInsights