If it saves ONE CHILD la la la la liberals!!

So go ahead and show where the “and saved” was ever used by a POLITICIAN, not “the government” for a jobs bill.

Obama was a bright politician, knowing he could pull this type of crap with no pushback from the MSM.

Early in his first term he said he directed all his departments heads to save some really small amount of their budgets. Not only did he get away with the amount being a pittance, the MSM never asked him about it again.

“You never did answer those questions last time I asked.”
Because it is a silly question. Biden was VP who would have literally had access to squillions of docs, many of which he would have taken home to work on. He and many other VP’s would have done this. Trump on the other hand was asked to return them when it was determined by the archives that he sensitive material. So hat did he do? He hid some and them lied saying all was returned. Huge difference.

Yup. The Animas River. The EPA never admitted wrongdoing, if I remember correctly.

I’m happy to back up what I say.

Then you should be able to tell me where the “it’s ok if you return them” clause is with regard to classified documents, and what job Biden had from 2017-2021 that required that he have them in his garage. You never did answer those questions last time I asked.

I remember that, actually not that long ago … maybe 9 or 10 years, EPA actually botched the “cleanup”, caused a blow low out, and severely polluted the creek for several miles downstream with highly toxic tailings.

https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/secondhand-smoke/health.html#:~:text=Secondhand%20smoke%20causes%20lung%20cancer&text=Even%20brief%20exposure%20to%20secondhand%20smoke%20can%20damage%20the%20body's,the%20cancer%20process%20in%20motion.&text=As%20with%20active%20smoking%2C%20the,risk%20of%20developing%20lung%20cancer.

Milloy also had an excellent video or picture of PM2.5 live HUMAN experiments at one of the “Universities” showing diesel fumes being pumped into the air intakes for the breathing apparatus.

Milloy: EPA’s Assessment of PM2.5 is Science Fraud • Watts Up With That?

I’m happy to back up what I say. Much easier when you start from an honest statement… which is why Mark disappears like this when he is caught making stuff up.

“Run away” Simon? Coming from you?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12750205/

Or a truthful one in yours.

Some people don’t know reasonable. Some years ago there was a proposal to measure dioxins in the Columbia River in parts per *quadrillion*. My thought on that was “So this person wants to somehow make one of the largest rivers in the world pure enough to kill everything in it?”. Nevermind that forest fires generate massive amounts of dioxins, turpenes, and various other fun chemical compounds, then rain hoses lots of that into the Pacific Northwest watershed, most of which eventually drains into the Columbia River.

Anti-oil? Then you’re also anti-aspirin. Its chemical synthesis begins with benzene which is a component of crude oil. An anti-oil person will also have to give up wintergreen mint flavoring because it’s also made from oil.

They conveniently forget that it was Carter who established a section of the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge for oil exploration. What section? The part that’s an arctic desert where nothing lives except for some lichen, moss, some small insects, and probably some bacteria. What’s not there are caribou, reindeer, or other large animals.

There’s no trees, bushes etc. Nothing that can’t live with six months of darkness each year.

But the media and other people against drilling for oil in the Arctic part of ANWR only show pictures and video of sub-Arctic ANWR where there are plants and animals – where Carter did not establish a section for drilling for oil.

Remember that mountain town in (IIRC) Colorado the EPA insisted was horribly contaminated with lead from the abandoned silver mine up on the mountain, yet nobody in the town had elevated levels of lead and nobody suffered from any of the problems caused by lead poisoning. But the EPA insisted the place was worthy of being a Superfund cleanup site and everyone would just have to leave while the government razed it then hauled away the “contaminated” topsoil.

Nevrmind that in many cases “updating” an old power plant to meet current emissions regulations would entail razing it to the ground and building a new one, which would face all kinds of costly hurdles such as protests and lawsuits, along with ever changing EPA rules and regs – before they’d even get the permits to start building.